It’s also no different from your kind freaking out over the walrus book or conservative apps and demanding that corporations obliterate them.
Which libraries anonymous? The ones of school children? Taking your porn and gender confusion and anti white, anti American books out of school libraries is no different than when you hysterically screamed to have the Bible removed from them or the 10 commandments our laws are based on removed from the courts. That requires that they DO NOT advocate or indoctrinate for anything at odds with the wishes of almost any parents. If another Parent wants to send their child to Young Pioneers, or Jesus Loves Me primary – that is theirs.īut today much of our schools are government operated. If you want to send your kids to Drag Queen PreSchool – that is your business. Ultimately the best solution to all this nonsense over schools is to allow parents to send their children to the school of their choice. Most parents are better at looking out for the best interests of their kids, that other adults. When adults make choices for children – it is best, but not perfect to have parents do the choosing. I choose what news I will read – not government, not facebook.īut Adults make choices for Children – with decreasing frequency as they approach adulthood. To the greatest extent possible we should allow adults to make their own choices. Choice always implicitly involves saying NO alot – we can not have everything. Nearly everything in the world involves CHOICES. You seem to think that School libraries are infinitely large, and that 5yr olds have the cognative abilities of John Stuart Mill.
#DADDY TWITTER GAY PORN FREE#
It seems that, when it comes to free speech, there are simply some people you cannot reach. There remain media figures who would prefer censorship to the outbreak of free speech. Yet, it is hard to see the downside given the massive censorship system now imposed across social media. Musk may prove a fraud or prove to be a champion of free speech. So media figures are calling for government regulation of media after the first major victory against corporate censorship. Congress hasn’t gotten round to limiting whether someone can own all of Twitter.”
#DADDY TWITTER GAY PORN TV#
“It’s true if you are a democracy like the United States that used to regulate media ownership and say Rupert Murdoch can’t have too many local TV stations and newspapers in one town, they have laws for that are still on the books. However, now it is dire as Musk threatens to restore free speech protections to the platform: None of this was a threat to democracy when Twitter was suspending dozens of political figures and commentators, including the President of the United States.
While Trump said that he will not return to Twitter, Melber is worried that he could be allowed to tweet again. Melber actually warns that Musk might secretly ban political figures while warning that Donald Trump will have his ban lifted by Musk. That is precisely what Twitter has been doing without a whimper of objection from most pundits on the left. Or you could just secretly turn down the reach of their stuff and turn up the reach of something else and the rest of us might not even find about it til after the election.” “If you own all of Twitter or Facebook or what have you, you don’t have to explain yourself, you don’t even have to be transparent, you could secretly ban one party’s candidate or all of its candidates, all of it nominees. He emphasized “this thing matters a ton.” That is a ton more than it mattered for the last six years. the way it has been used against their opponents. Melber is warning the left that Twitter could be used against them. That is apparently worse than Twitter openly banning candidates and suspending accounts of conservatives for years.
Melber warns that Elon Musk might actually use Twitter to “secretly ban” or “turn down the reach” of a political party or candidate. MSNBC host Ari Melber had a revealing moment on Monday that seemed almost a clinical (if not comical) example of transference.